Archive for October, 2004

November Incoming

Friday, October 29th, 2004

The last two weeks have been hard-core, with pretty much non-stop work between exams, projects, labs and problem sets. At long last they have ended.

It’s worth noting that I’m not very good at blogging while at school :-/ Most of my entries tend to be reactive, in that I’m posting my thoughts and feelings in reaction to something i’ve read/seen. My content consumption of non-class related content is pretty small — I’m not reading three or four books a week like I was over summer.

I find myself with mild regrets, over these past four years. How things might have gone differently. Romantic possibilities missed due to overanalysis or overcaution or overidealism. Are my undergraduate years coming to an end? Somehow my life has been nothing like what I saw in the movies :-/ I didn’t meet anyone whom I started a company with, I haven’t found anyone with whom I’ve fallen in love… four years have passed pretty much, and life goes on, much as it has, save I’m older and wiser.

That said, I’ve also not gotten drunk, never actually been to a club in Boston, gone to all of one formal, started and stopped ballroom dancing three times… hmm. Classes have gone well all my college years, and I have a large set of friends, but there isn’t really anyone on campus I’m close to, who I see/talk to often.

I wonder if that’s typical, if what we’ve seen in the movies of groups of tight-knit friends always hanging out together is nothing more than a myth. If at MIT, everyone is working solo pretty much, ‘cept when they work together on psets, and everyone has his or her own interests at heart, and groups of tight-knit friends that always do things together are mostly just a movie myth.

And yes, I’m whining that my life isn’t as great as it could be. I’m 21, I can buy w(h)ine. Horrible pun, I know.

Open Book Exams

Tuesday, October 26th, 2004

One has to wonder how much they’re testing your knowledge of the material vs. your knowledge of where the material is in the book.

In either case, one open book exam tonight and another one Thursday morning.

Wish me luck :)

10101

Wednesday, October 20th, 2004

I turned 10101 today, in binary :)

And I used the words “temporal milestone attained” on dominik.net.

And it looks the Sox win, yay… not that I follow baseball, but this series sort of pulled everyone in Boston in :P

Birthdays just get more and more low key each year… It’s all been downhill since I turned 1010 ;) I like lowkey though. Thank you to all those who sent cards or otherwise conveyed their wishes :)

And life goes on.

Infinite Loop

Saturday, October 16th, 2004

Sigh, if only there were a way to somehow broadcast an intent in a relationship along the lines of “someone to hug tightly and share experiences with” without complicating the situation… unfortunately I don’t think I could hug someone tightly and share experiences with unless we clicked and I have no way to determine if interaction clicks without engaging in a relationship which I won’t do because I don’t know if it’ll click. Infinite loop for the lose.

Wednesday, October 13th, 2004

You know the first batch of midterms has rolled around when walking through the halls at 1 am, every lounge is full of students tooling and every other doorway sports two people huddled over a piece of paper, engaged in discussion.

MIT students aren’t afraid of showing that they study, unlike what I’ve heard from friends at other schools (e.g. Harvard and Stanford). Is that so? Do people not study openly at other places? :Pgallup advance nm loanswatertown jewelry loan american ctsubsidized loans alma collegefever alloantibody$0 loans federal stafford student feeloan american 38115 coloan subsidized 2008-2009 stafford2000 loan apydayal bank malaysia rajhi loan personalamerization of loanacorn casinocharles casino st ameristar mocard gambling canada credit merchant accountmerchant california casino account offshoremo casino st charles ameristarcasino online all jackpotscasino internet gambling merchant offshore account1 home 3 in 31 casino Map

New Paul Graham

Thursday, October 7th, 2004

More insights from the author of Hackers & Painters:
http://www.paulgraham.com/bubble.html

A quote that resonated:
“What makes the Bay Area superior is the attitude of the people. I notice that when I come home to Boston. The first thing I see when I walk out of the airline terminal is the fat, grumpy guy in charge of the taxi line. I brace myself for rudeness: remember, you’re back on the East Coast now.”

And his conclusion:
“When one looks over these trends, is there any overall theme? There does seem to be: that in the coming century, good ideas will count for more. That 26 year olds with good ideas will increasingly have an edge over 50 year olds with powerful connections. That doing good work will matter more than dressing up– or advertising, which is the same thing for companies. That people will be rewarded a bit more in proportion to the value of what they create.

If so, this is good news indeed. Good ideas always tend to win eventually. The problem is, it can take a very long time. It took decades for relativity to be accepted, and the greater part of a century to establish that central planning didn’t work. So even a small increase in the rate at which good ideas win would be a momentous change– big enough, probably, to justify a name like the “new economy.”"cingular 007 ringtonevga free samsung ringtone 1000free nokia 3310 ringtone monophonicpolyphonic ringtone 8100 free sanyomotorola mp3 ringtone a630a800 polyphonic ringtone samsung ukadverts samsung ringtonealltel downloads ringtone Map

On A Semi-Romantic Casual Relationship

Monday, October 4th, 2004

At the beginning of the school year, when asked “What was I looking for [in a relationship]?” I answered with what felt like an appropriate choice of words: “a semi-romantic casual relationship.”

I chose those words because I knew I wasn’t looking for a fully romantic serious relationship, one leading to engagement and marriage. I’m not yet at that stage of my life, and I’ve abandoned previous theories that imagined meeting one person with whom a multi-stage relationship should could gradually blossom into marriage. I don’t think the process of falling truly in love is gradual at all. It isn’t instant, perhaps, but it is a rapid process nonetheless.

Those logical considerations made, I thereby arrived at reasoning about love while sounding like a mathematician. Perhaps not the best tone or perspective, but it is one I am familiar with and relatively comfortable with. I like having things defined and understood, and relationships have a tendency to be very undefinable and difficult to (ever) understand. In essence, I mentally made consent to the point that one can “date” someone without being in love with her. That said, I’m not sure if I’m actually comfortable with that point, nor am I sure what I precisely mean by “being love with her,” as I can’t say I’ve ever experienced the romantic facet of that emotion.

So what, precisely, did I intend to have in this theoretical semi-romantic casual relationship? Ideally it would fall into something that would not take too much time (spending over 40 hours a week with someone is no longer casual), that would not become overly emotionally involved (not even sure if that’s possible, considering strong relationships for me start from emotional ties), that would perhaps involve some cuddling and maybe kissing (newbie territory for me) and would involve doing things together for fun, i.e. eating dinner or going for a movie, or to a formal or to the park, or sailing or whatever, in short, relaxing together.

Whether that definition is realistic within the modern world, and specifically within the microcosm known as MIT, remains to be seen. Thus far, it has not been realistic. Many relationships here involve sex in one way or another, and sex for me is something that is firmly set within the context of marriage (it doesn’t make sense anywhere else within my intellectual and spiritual framework). Finally, I’m not sure how to instantiate such a “semi-romantic casual relationship.” One cannot simply walk up to someone and say, “Hi, I like you, you seem to like me, want to have a semi-romantic casual relationship?” (Granted, I haven’t tried that, but I strongly doubt it would work — though, perhaps at a place as nerdy as MIT it might, but even then it is far too nerdy to fit into my style — I may think like a geek at times, but I like to think I have at least some social graces).

Finally there is the issue of mutual attractiveness. I don’t think I would be comfortable cuddling or kissing someone who I’m not physically attracted to, mentally attracted to and spiritually attracted to/compatible with. I haven’t run into many people who meet those stringent qualifications (stringent as compared to some of my friends’ mere requirement of “recognizably female;” though I think/hope they said that at least partly in jest) and even when I do, I’m not particularly good at telling if mutual attractiveness is there. If I like her, does she like me? And even if she does like me, most of the time she’s taken already, and I’d rather not start a semi-romantic casual relationship by destroying or attempting to destroy another relationship already in place, even if the relationship is a so-called “non-relationship relationship.”

And so I find myself 4 weeks into the semester (already, wow), without a significant other, decently happy, well-fed, classes going well, and not a cloud on the sky aside from an occasional passing thought of “hmm, it’d be nice to hug/cuddle/kiss someone beautiful from time to time.” I’m content proceeding under these circumstances, and am determined that education trump any semi-romantic casual interests, but I’m certainly open to creating something, but am not exactly sure how to proceed.

As always, your comments and constructive criticism are most welcome.